Natural moralities
a defense of pluralistic relativism
"David B. Wong defends an ambitious and important new version of relativism. The version he defends here is both an alternative to, and fits between, universalism and the usual definition of relativism. Wong examines a wide array of positions and texts within the Western canon as well as in Chinese philosophy, and draws on not only philosophy, but psychology, evolutionary theory, history, and literature as well, in pursuit of his goal, which is to make a case for the importance of pluralism in moral life, and to establish the virtues of acceptance and accommodation."--Jacket.
Beyond its central premise, the book can be read through the connected lenses of Philosophy. Those themes offer useful points of attention as the characters, ideas, or world develop, especially where the book complicates the expectations of its primary category.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What the reading experience may hold
A fuller profile for choosing with more confidence—not just another copy of the preview.
Philosophy
Use these as starting points rather than limits; the most memorable books often stretch beyond their catalog labels.
No specific content concerns can be confirmed from the available English catalog information. Consult a publisher or reader-supplied guide when detailed warnings matter.
These notes are inferred from available catalog information and may not be complete. Check a publisher or reader-supplied guide if you need comprehensive warnings.
Balanced tone · Measured pace
A comfortable full-length choice for steady daily reading.
A good fit if…
Readers who want a thoughtful experience and enjoy noticing the connections beneath a book’s surface story.
This book's DNA
A visual estimate based on this edition's categories, description, and length. Select a star to explore the signals.
This signal is descriptive, not a rating. It helps compare the kind of reading experience this edition may offer.
Spoiler-Free Emotional Arc
A broad estimate of the book’s emotional rhythm, shown without story events or outcomes.
This visualization is an interpretive estimate based on catalog description, categories, tone, pace, and content signals. It does not describe specific scenes.
A quick reading snapshot
Edition facts and catalog signals to help you decide whether this book fits what you want to read next.
- ISBN-13
- 978-0-1953-0539-5
- Language
- English
- Edition record
- OL3430903M
A more thoughtful way into this book
This guide uses the edition details and category signals above to help you choose deliberately. It does not replace the author's work or a full review.
A comfortable full-length choice for steady daily reading.
Begin with its place in Philosophy, then notice where the book resists that label.
Read for connection, not completion.
Mark one passage that sharpens the book's central concern and one that complicates it. That tension often reveals more than a quick summary.
Three questions to carry with you
- What question is the author really asking beneath the book’s main argument?
- Which claim challenges one of your familiar assumptions?
- What remains unresolved—and is that uncertainty useful?
Editorial framework by Wesley Bryan, BookenDeX Founder and Editor.
More Philosophy books
These matches combine shared categories with author, publication-era, and reading-length signals.
A brief history of creation
by Bill Mesler
Why it fits: shares Philosophy, a similar reading length, a similar publication era.
A Philosophy of Cinematic Art
by Berys Gaut
Why it fits: shares Philosophy, a similar reading length, a similar publication era.
Chic Ironic Bitterness
by R. Jay Magill
Why it fits: shares Philosophy, a similar reading length, a similar publication era.
Ethics and Religion in a Pluralistic Age
by Brian Hebblethwaite
Why it fits: shares Philosophy, a similar reading length, a similar publication era.
Faith enterprise
by Richard Maus
Why it fits: shares Philosophy, a similar reading length, a similar publication era.
Forced Exit
by Wesley J. Smith
Why it fits: shares Philosophy, a similar reading length, a similar publication era.